Name: DAINE GONÇALVES ORNELLAS
Publication date: 19/06/2019
Advisor:
Name |
Role |
|---|---|
| FLAVIO CHEIM JORGE | Advisor * |
| THIAGO FERREIRA SIQUEIRA | Co-advisor * |
Examining board:
| Name |
Role |
|---|---|
| FLAVIO CHEIM JORGE | Advisor * |
| MARCELO ABELHA RODRIGUES | Internal Examiner * |
| THIAGO FERREIRA SIQUEIRA | Co advisor * |
Summary: Due to the changes made by the Civil Procedure Code of 2015 related to when decisions on certain matters can, from now on, be challenged, this study will analyze, starting from the historical-normative evolution of the agravo [a Brazilian type of interlocutory appeal], the state of the art of the impugnation of first instances decisions. After that, it will be shown that adjustments in the appeal are required, considering the theory of legal remedies, since it is, from now on, the appropriate remedy of some decisions rendered in the course of the proceedings, and it is also necessary to distinguish when handling each of its various forms of interposition provided by procedural law. Finally, it will be shown the consequences of this significant modification in the appeals system as a whole.
Keywords: appeal. cross-appeal. interlocutory appeal. decision on matters.
